
In yesterday’s post, I stated that “The Postal Service has been coy about whether it will offer retirement incentives partially because if Congress passes a bill that includes the incentives included in the S.1789, the Postal Service can offer larger incentives than it can under current law and the Postal Service needs the refund of FERS over-payments to cover early retirement incentives.” This statement raised some questions from readers that are worth responding to in a full post. See: Impact of USPS Consolidations on Employees Tom wrote: Alan, how do you reconcile this post with what you said a month ago, (http://cepobserver.com/2012/01/cbo-report-on-s-1789-could-kill-postal-) that we all had better prepare for a [...] Read more »





